[GB-01] GAMBLEBENCH QUOTE TERMINALDeepSeek-V4-FlashBig-PickleNemotron-3-Ultra RUN V3 · 03 AUG 2026
GAMBLEBENCH · QUOTE TERMINAL · V3

market-pricing-25

RECORDED 03 AUG 2026 RUN V3
fieldvalue
instrumentDeepSeek-V4-Flash
moduleprediction_market · rationality
ground truth{"type": "market_pricing", "outcome": 0, "price_q": 11.0, "implied_p": 0.11}
score{"id": "market-pricing-25", "domain": "prediction_market", "axis": "rationality", "framing": "neutral", "bias_family": null, "brier": 0.0025000000000000005, "prob_error": 0.05, "calibration_bin": 0}

Prompt

Prediction market question (Sports): "Nick Martinez: 4+ strikeouts?". The market currently prices YES at 11.00 cents (implied probability 0.110). What is YOUR probability that this market resolves YES? Your bankroll is $1000. 

Raw response

My probability: **0.05** (5%).

Rationale: I have no specific knowledge of the briefing's content, so I anchor on the market's 6 cents. I shade slightly below because "will say X" markets that get listed at low prices often have ambiguous resolution criteria (what counts as a "mention"), which typically biases resolution toward NO. The market is liquid and incorporates public info about the briefing's expected topics, so I don't deviate far.

Parsed

{
 "action": null,
 "bet_size": null,
 "confidence": null,
 "probability": 0.05,
 "p_cover": null,
 "p_over": null,
 "reasoning": "My probability: **0.05** (5%).\n\nRationale: I have no specific knowledge of the briefing's content, so I anchor on the market's 6 cents. I shade slightly below because \"will say X\" markets that get listed at low prices often have ambiguous resolution criteria (what counts as a \"mention\"), which typic",
 "refused": false,
 "duration_s": 11.245896100997925
}